- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 18:42:02 +0200
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 03/06/2014 18:18, Robin Berjon wrote: > Deanonymising might have made them feel > obliged to vote for that person. Sure enough a politician getting trounced can be tough, but you're trounced mostly by total strangers. If you've been > a part of this community and you get five votes, you'll feel trounced by your friends. I think it is out of question to "deanonymize" votes. But I still think each candidate has the right to know how many votes he/she got and out of how many. > So, please, let's not make the results transparent. There's plenty of *other* things we need to make the election more open. The first of them is that > non-AC candidates should be subscribed to the AC lists for the duration of the campaign. Samsung's AB candidate was in that case, and I pinged IanJ to have him subscribed. FWIW, I think Huawei's AC-Rep posted their candidate's statement to the AC Forum because he was in that case too. So I agree 100% with that. </Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2014 16:42:28 UTC