Re: On Call for Consensus - "Use 'Schulze STV' for voting"

On 2014-06-11 07:34, Charles McCathie Nevile wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:22:49 +0200, Wayne Carr 
> <> wrote:
> ...
>> This is a suggestion to the AB to ask for an AC poll on using Schulze
>> STV one time for the next TAG election. (or the next cycle, TAG and AB,
>> if proponents prefer that).
> Formally, this requires a change to the Process. I don't think it is a 
> complex change, if there is clear consensus for it, but it may be a 
> difficult way to get information. And drawing a lot of conclusions 
> from a single election is limited by the circumstances of the 
> individual election.

OK, I withdraw the suggestion.

> I don't object to the idea, and would support it, but I would like us 
> to have more longitudinal data too, which is why I think collecting 
> better data over a series of elections would *probably* be more useful.
> (I'm still thinking about all this - at some point I will look for a 
> CfC when I have a clear question that I think is the right one, but 
> others are welcome to make one in the meantime. I'll send a different 
> message about 'process' in this group to clarify people can do it).
> cheers
> Chaals

Received on Thursday, 12 June 2014 15:25:58 UTC