RE: Voting and W3C level of engagement

Interesting discussion here.
Fine is not ok, of course. But you may know that some standardization bodies are defining a kind of rule where your participation to group activity allows you to participate in decision making (e.g. voting is only permitted when attending the 3 last meeting). This corresponds more or less to the good standing/bad standing that W3C defined but never uses.
I am more in favor of encouraging positively people, having an appropriate communication/education to members about essentials W3C decision making, and importance to have vote being relevant to have a strategy backed by most of members.
(Note that I am not trying here to define what is a relevant vote, as we have very different view from 20% to 80%, but I have the feeling that we definitely need more voters then what we have today).


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Jaffe []
Sent: dimanche 8 juin 2014 16:23
To: Nottingham, Mark
Cc: Daniel Glazman;
Subject: Re: Voting and W3C level of engagement

On 6/8/2014 10:13 AM, Nottingham, Mark wrote:
> Nope - that's mandatory voting; if you don't, it's a $50 fine.

I don't know what others think, but I would not be overly supportive of using that approach for W3C elections.

> Sent from my iPhone
>> On 7 Jun 2014, at 10:46 pm, "Jeff Jaffe" <> wrote:
>>> On 6/7/2014 4:11 PM, Nottingham, Mark wrote:
>>> ... And in Australia, it's usually around 80%.
>> Ah, the benefits of STV ;)
>>> Just for the record.
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> On 7 Jun 2014, at 1:58 pm, "Daniel Glazman" <> wrote:
>>>>> On 06/06/2014 22:31, Jeff Jaffe wrote:
>>>>> According to fairvote [1], typical turnout for Congressional
>>>>> elections in the US midterm is about 40%.  I don't have
>>>>> comprehensive data on local elections, but when I searched for
>>>>> some article about that, I learned that 25% is quite typical for municipal elections [2].
>>>> In the US, maybe. Not here on the Old Continent. Turnout for
>>>> municipal elections is rarely below 60% in continental Europe...
>>>> That's just for the record and does not want to have any influence
>>>> on our current discussion.
>>>> </Daniel>

 This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited.
E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender.
Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus.

Received on Sunday, 8 June 2014 20:32:19 UTC