- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 13:34:23 -0400
- To: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 6/16/2014 1:30 PM, Wayne Carr wrote: > > On 2014-06-16 08:43, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> Jeff and Ralph asked me to clarify my expectations regarding point #1 >> of the comments I submitted for [Proposal]: >> >> [[ >> 1. The comments from @SomeCommenter should be addressed (f.e.x. >> discussed and implemented where there is consensus) before the >> Director approves this proposed ProcDoc. Otherwise, the AB, as the >> Consortium's "process steward" sets a `bad example` for other groups >> that *are* required to address all Last Call comments. > > As I remember it, those comments weren't "Last Call" comments. There > were no comments in the second last call at all (in April), presumably > having been dealt with satisfactorily in the first last call. Am I > misremembering this? You remember correctly. > > I assume you are referring to comments that came in as part of the AC > review. Those comments appear to me largely editorial and so can be > fixed as part of the usual process of considering the AC review and > not hold up approval. Other comments may be new topics for the next > round of revisions. I don't remember any significant point of > disagreement. > >> >> 2. As I understand it, the `transition plan` is the 5 points in >> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Mar/0019.html>. >> I think this plan is somewhat incomprehensible and should be >> clarified before the proposal is implemented. For instance, I can't >> tell which specific point(s?) apply to WebApps. >> >> 3.Work on a related Best Practices / FAQ should be started *before* >> the proposal is implemented. >> ]] >> >> Since the [RfC] identifies [Proposal] as a "Last Call" document, I >> expect the process defined by [ProcDoc] applies. > > Last Call has been over for quite a while. > >> >> (AFAIK, the comments from @SomeCommenter are not Public and I do not >> have permission to copy them to Public space.) >> >> -HTH, AB >> >> [RfC] >> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Mar/0019.html> >> [Proposal] <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html> >> [ProcDoc] >> <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#formal-address> >> >> >> > >
Received on Monday, 16 June 2014 17:34:30 UTC