- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 10:50:58 -0400
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, public-w3process@w3.org
On 6/3/2014 10:35 AM, Daniel Glazman wrote: > On 03/06/2014 16:13, Jeff Jaffe wrote: > >> 98 Members voted which is more than 25% of the Membership. Personally, >> I am quite pleased that there was this level of interest. While not the >> 90+% that I would have preferred, the 25% is still larger than some >> democratic political elections in some locations. They voted for 355 >> candidates, an average of 3.6 votes per Member. >> >> 51 of the 98 voted for 5 candidates. >> >> 22 of the 98 voted for 1 candidate. > This is an excellent start, thank you Jeff, exactly the kind of > anonymized data I was thinking of. Now, let's add the %age of votes > for each candidate leading to the five elected and we'll be all set. I'll take the AB's advice on this one. Above I provided data that I believe everyone was comfortable with. The next level drill-down might stumble across concerns that I've heard about "embarrassing people who did not get a certain percentage". > > BTW, since you gave us those figures, I think all ACs deserve having > them too... Sure. But in an earlier thread, some AC folks asked voting to be moved here so they didn't need to spammed by the voting thread. > > I find 25% extremely low. You should see the percentage participation on Charter approvals :(. Much lower. Even though I view that as extremely important. > I think you should, as W3C CEO, reach out > to the AC Forum to remind the Membership that one of the > benefits they get from the annual fee they pay is the ability to vote. > > </Daniel> > >
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2014 14:51:06 UTC