- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 16:28:34 -0400
- To: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, public-w3process@w3.org
On 6/8/14 9:07 AM, Charles McCathie Nevile wrote: > For the record I still don't support notably increasing its size. What is your definition of `notable` here? Is 12 or 18 or 24 ok? > I do support moving as much as possible of what it does to the AC at > large, or community groups, and making the AB's work as transparent as > possible (this allows AC reps to check that the people they trust > really *are* representing them). What specific role/task cannot be handled by the AC and why? > I think it is also important that the AB make a significant commitment > to be available, that AC reps at large do not and should not have to make. (I guess I'll have to wait for my `secret decoder ring` to arrive on July 1 to try to understand why the entire Membership shouldn't be privy to info shared with such a tiny subset of Members.) -Thanks, AB
Received on Sunday, 8 June 2014 20:29:02 UTC