- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 18:52:59 +0200
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: public-w3process@w3.org
On 02/06/2014 18:46, L. David Baron wrote: > Agreed. > > Though if we want to understand more about how changes in voting > systems would affect the results, it would be even more helpful to > have an anonymized list of ballots (so that we have the information > about which candidates were voted for *together*). I'm not sure if > making that available would be considered to make the data too > de-anonymizable? I agree but I think the disclosed data would be too complex to be readable in that case. In the election that just ended, there were 12 candidates for 5 seats, and ACs can select less than 5 candidates if they want. The number of possible combinations is really too important. </Daniel>
Received on Monday, 2 June 2014 16:53:24 UTC