- From: Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH) <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 16:28:47 +0000
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
I'm fine with #2 and #3 below but in #1 > Otherwise, the AB, as the Consortium's > "process steward" sets a `bad example` for other groups that *are* > required to address all Last Call comments. What unprocessed Last Call comments are you referring to? David Singer's comments in the breakout session and AC ballot are essentially "PR" comments not "LC" comments. ________________________________________ From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 8:43 AM To: public-w3process Subject: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html Jeff and Ralph asked me to clarify my expectations regarding point #1 of the comments I submitted for [Proposal]: [[ 1. The comments from @SomeCommenter should be addressed (f.e.x. discussed and implemented where there is consensus) before the Director approves this proposed ProcDoc. Otherwise, the AB, as the Consortium's "process steward" sets a `bad example` for other groups that *are* required to address all Last Call comments. 2. As I understand it, the `transition plan` is the 5 points in <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Mar/0019.html>. I think this plan is somewhat incomprehensible and should be clarified before the proposal is implemented. For instance, I can't tell which specific point(s?) apply to WebApps. 3.Work on a related Best Practices / FAQ should be started *before* the proposal is implemented. ]] Since the [RfC] identifies [Proposal] as a "Last Call" document, I expect the process defined by [ProcDoc] applies. (AFAIK, the comments from @SomeCommenter are not Public and I do not have permission to copy them to Public space.) -HTH, AB [RfC] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Mar/0019.html> [Proposal] <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html> [ProcDoc] <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#formal-address>
Received on Monday, 16 June 2014 16:29:19 UTC