- From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 07:47:02 -0400
- To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Cc: public-w3process@w3.org, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <CADC=+jeMG69krRYj7er9YhUUT9bsvCXvA5AMuaV5Er4B2k_q3w@mail.gmail.com>
On Jun 6, 2014 12:24 AM, "Jeff Jaffe" <jeff@w3.org> wrote: > > > On 6/4/2014 9:06 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: >> >> On 04/06/2014 14:57 , Arthur Barstow wrote: >>> >>> On 6/4/14 8:03 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: >>>> >>>> Maybe we should do some AC training. When I ran for TAG I was >>>> surprised at how many reps wrote to say "I'd like to vote for you but >>>> I don't understand how". >>> >>> >>> Oh dear. That's really {s,b}ad. The closest thing I know about related >>> to AC Newbies is <https://www.w3.org/wiki/AdvisoryCommittee/NewbieInfo>. >>> If there is some additional info that should be added, please do update >>> that doc or send me the details and I'll be happy to update it. That >>> said, perhaps there are better ways/medium to reach Newbies (f.ex. a >>> 5-10 minute video that address the issue you raise as well as other AC >>> Newbie FAQs). (I just filed a related issue in the AC tracker >>> <https://www.w3.org/Member/track/issues/7>). >> >> >> I'd add to the wiki but I couldn't get a sense for what wasn't working for them — I sent some instructions in the hope that something would happen. >> >> Voting is basically clicking on a link in an email that comes to you, then ticking someone's name and hitting Submit. >> >> I guess there could be several reasons (possibly mixed): >> >> • Email never got read, is lost somewhere in Inbox/Trash. >> • Rep does not know about http://w3.org/Member/, etc. >> • Lost password >> • Confused by WBS UI (I think it's pretty readable, but it's old school so might confuse some?) >> • Laziness (could figure out how to do but would rather be told) > > > I would add a few others: > > * AC rep does not know any of the candidates well. > * AC rep is from a small company that participates in W3C for one focused reason and does not care much about the broader topics usually discussed at the AB. > I'd like to add, as I've mentioned, another possible reason is the ACs position in the company does not make them in a position to care about some things and to them most of this is noise. My company is international, by no measure small - because of what we do our AC would likely be a gate keeper of non technical nature who mostly cares about ip agreements or something. The reason i keep reiterating this is because i don't think it is uncommon and it may be effective to allow ACs to delegate some roles.
Received on Friday, 6 June 2014 11:47:31 UTC