- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:43:25 -0400
- To: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
Jeff and Ralph asked me to clarify my expectations regarding point #1 of the comments I submitted for [Proposal]: [[ 1. The comments from @SomeCommenter should be addressed (f.e.x. discussed and implemented where there is consensus) before the Director approves this proposed ProcDoc. Otherwise, the AB, as the Consortium's "process steward" sets a `bad example` for other groups that *are* required to address all Last Call comments. 2. As I understand it, the `transition plan` is the 5 points in <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Mar/0019.html>. I think this plan is somewhat incomprehensible and should be clarified before the proposal is implemented. For instance, I can't tell which specific point(s?) apply to WebApps. 3.Work on a related Best Practices / FAQ should be started *before* the proposal is implemented. ]] Since the [RfC] identifies [Proposal] as a "Last Call" document, I expect the process defined by [ProcDoc] applies. (AFAIK, the comments from @SomeCommenter are not Public and I do not have permission to copy them to Public space.) -HTH, AB [RfC] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Mar/0019.html> [Proposal] <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html> [ProcDoc] <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#formal-address>
Received on Monday, 16 June 2014 15:43:55 UTC