- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 16:46:04 +0200
- To: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>, "daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- CC: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 04/06/2014 16:14 , Sylvain Galineau wrote: > And with Jeff suggesting 25% participation is actually high compared > to voting on charters - what's the problem there? The word 'charter'? > - I'm afraid bikeshedding the name mostly treats a symptom instead of > finding the cause. I don't think that you can compare both. I don't think that people should vote on specific group charters unless they have a specific interest in how that specific area should work. Besides... they aren't votes. It's a way of gather comments and assessing their intensity. IMHO no matter which way you dice it 25% isn't high. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2014 14:46:19 UTC