Re: Disclosing election results -- a voice of caution

On 6/3/2014 7:53 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote:
> On Jun 3, 2014, at 7:13 AM, Jeff Jaffe <> wrote:
>> 98 Members voted which is more than 25% of the Membership.  Personally, I am quite pleased that there was this level of interest.  While not the 90+% that I would have preferred, the 25% is still larger than some democratic political elections in some locations.
> That it's larger than some place does not make it good, or even good enough. In the democracies I know, 25% participation is considered to seriously lack in relevance and legitimacy. Typical editorials and headlines in such outcomes wax much angst on 'our broken democracy' etc. Needless to say, I didn't expect you to be 'quite pleased'.

As I said elsewhere in the thread, my impression is that there are 
various reasons why large numbers of Members (particularly smaller ones) 
are not that interested in voting.

Also, I was pleased because this is a higher turnout than in the past.

But I agree (as I said) that I would prefer 90%+.

> But I also don't think 'open voting' - however defined - or the lack thereof has anything to do with this either.

Received on Friday, 6 June 2014 04:36:04 UTC