RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbp
[WNET] Fwd: Re: W3C Task Force on Porting Wordnet to the Semantic Web
RE: [ALL] Requirements for updating OWL -- was FAQ : Constraints on data values range
[PORT] policy on URI structure for thesaurus concepts
[PORT] SKOS migration guidelines
Re: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft
RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": comments on draft $swbp
- RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": comments on draft $swbp
- RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": comments on draft $swbp
RE: Classes as values $swbp
Syntax Proposal [All] $swbp
[ALL] F2F meeting at ESWS / OntoWeb / KnowledgeWeb in Crete
[PORT] method note
Announcement of SWAD-Europe SKOS API for thesauri web service
[ADTF] possible illustration of apps and demos direction
RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": comments on draft
Classes as values
[ALL] Introduction
RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft $swbpd
[Fwd: [OEP,ALL] Potential FAQ: annotation schema problem
[ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon
- Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon
- RE: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon
- Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon
- Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon
- RE: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon
- Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon
- Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon
- RE: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon
- Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon
RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft $swbpd
[OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft
- Re: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft
- Re: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft
- RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft
- RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft
FW: [OEP] Ontological purity, was "Classes as values" first draft + ODP basics $swbpd
RE: [OEP] Ontological purity, was "Classes as values" first draft + ODP basics $swbpd
- Re: [OEP] Ontological purity, was "Classes as values" first draft + ODP basics $swbpd
- RE: [OEP] Ontological purity, was "Classes as values" first draft + ODP basics $swbpd
timing for april 29 telecon
[OEP] Suggestions for other patterns
[ALL, XSCH] Proposal for telecon
Re: [ALL, OEP] Relationship between OWL and other ontology modelling
RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraintson datavalues range] $swbpd
[ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web
- [XSCH] draft comment on XML Schema WG draft charter
- Re: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web
- Re: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web
- Re: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web
- RE: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web
- Re: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web
- Re: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web
RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) $swbpd
RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbpd
RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbpd
RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbpd
RE: [OPEN] Guideline for when standard definitions areinadequate(was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question))
RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbpd
- RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbpd
- RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbpd
tips on getting blog projects to include more triples?
meeting record: 2004-04-15 SemWeb BPD WG telecon
Re: [OPEN] Guideline for when standard definitions are inadequate (was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question))
[All, OEP, WRLD] F2F at WWW in NYC $swbpd
regrets for telecon
RE: Whether property values should be namespace prefixed
Regrets
Introduction
RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range]
partial regrets for 15-April
[ALL, OEP] Relationship between OWL and other ontology modelling languages $swbpd
[ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon
- Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon
- OEP and Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon
- Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon
- RE: [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon
- Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon
[OEP] "Classes as values" first draft
- RE: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft
- Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft
- RE: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft
- RE: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft
- Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft
[OEP] or [UNITS] : How to explicitly define a Metaclass
Regrets for 2004-04-15 telecon
Regrets
RE: [UNITS, OEP] FAQ : Constraints on data values range
- RE: [UNITS, OEP] FAQ : Constraints on data values range
- RE: [UNITS, OEP] FAQ : Constraints on data values range
[UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range
- Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range
- Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range
- [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range]
- Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range
- Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range
[ALL] straw poll open for SWBPD telecon times
meeting record: 2004-04-01 SemWeb BPD WG telecon
Killer App: IRS
RE: [ALL] WordNet Task Force - work outline
RE: [WRLD] issue from Jena-dev
RE: [OEP] Scope - (was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question))
- RE: [OEP] Scope - (was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question))
- RE: [OEP] Scope - (was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question))
Re: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the ? TF
RE: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the TF
Distribution of Species Use
RE: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the TF
- Re: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the TF
- RE: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the TF
Would these be examples of questions for some best practices FAQ?
[ALL] More TF topics...?
[WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the TF
[THES] drafting Thesaurus TF overview
- Q on scope of ADTF
- RE: [THES] drafting Thesaurus TF overview
- Re: [THES] drafting Thesaurus TF overview
Introduction
Introduction: Tom Baker
Re: ALL: agenda April 1 telecon
WordNet TF: short note on porting issues
Re: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)
Re: WordNet Task Force - work outline
Re: [WRLD] issue from Jena-dev
RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments
- RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments
- RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments
- RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments
- RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments
- RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments
A simple exercise (was RE : philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)
RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)
- RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)
- RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)