W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > April 2004

Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft

From: Natasha Noy <noy@SMI.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:49:35 -0700
Message-Id: <AF748D19-923A-11D8-A755-000A958B5C28@smi.stanford.edu>
Cc: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>, <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>

> Let me suggest that rather than say that something is "in OWL-Full", 
> it would be better to say that it is not in OWL-DL. That is, the 
> important negative aspect of the simple solution is that it puts one 
> OUTSIDE the DL subcase.  This gets the key point across, and also I 
> think places the focus on what is going to be for many users the key 
> issue, which is whether or not the ontology will be rejected by 
> DL-restricted tools.

Yes, I'll change that. In particular since, strictly speaking, saying 
that something is in "OWL Full" doesn't say much: an OWL DL ontology is 
also an OWL Full ontology. It's the "non DL" aspect that's the key 

Received on Monday, 19 April 2004 15:52:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:30:53 UTC