W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > April 2004

Re: [WRLD] issue from Jena-dev

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 10:17:43 +0100
Message-ID: <406BDE37.5090007@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Nick Gibbins <nmg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: SWBPD list <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>

Nick Gibbins wrote:

> Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>>The following came up on Jena-dev, with the refrain "that sounds like a
>>job for best practices" ... (not exactly)
>>given an arbitrary source of semantic
>>web data on the 'net, what *is* the best practice for determining which
>>semantic-web language and encoding is being used?
>>(e.g. use OWL Full or DL or RDFS semantics)
> I'm not sure if this counts as best practice, but we use a simulated
> stochastic process to determine which Semantic Web language is being used
> by a particular file. You can see a demo of our technique at:
> http://triplestore.aktors.org/demo/OwlBall/

I think that qualifies under the "sorting out the mess that we've made"

intended as an RDFS file, not OWL Full?
(The semantics differ ...)

It made me laugh though.

Received on Thursday, 1 April 2004 04:18:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:30:53 UTC