W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > April 2004

Re: [WRLD] issue from Jena-dev

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 10:17:43 +0100
Message-ID: <406BDE37.5090007@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Nick Gibbins <nmg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: SWBPD list <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>

Nick Gibbins wrote:

> Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> 
>>The following came up on Jena-dev, with the refrain "that sounds like a
>>job for best practices" ... (not exactly)
>>
>>[[
>>given an arbitrary source of semantic
>>web data on the 'net, what *is* the best practice for determining which
>>semantic-web language and encoding is being used?
>>]]
>>(e.g. use OWL Full or DL or RDFS semantics)
> 
> 
> I'm not sure if this counts as best practice, but we use a simulated
> stochastic process to determine which Semantic Web language is being used
> by a particular file. You can see a demo of our technique at:
> 
> http://triplestore.aktors.org/demo/OwlBall/
> 

I think that qualifies under the "sorting out the mess that we've made"

Isn't
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl
intended as an RDFS file, not OWL Full?
(The semantics differ ...)

It made me laugh though.

Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2004 04:18:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:30:53 UTC