- From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:10:43 +0100
- To: "'Uschold, Michael F'" <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, ewallace@cme.nist.gov
- Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org, guarino@loa-cnr.it
I wanted to offer some comments on the draft which is at [1]. Dan Brickley, myself and others had an extended discussion this week about this issue. I would like to offer the following suggestion as a recommendation re the use of dc:subject. I believe the best way to express the fact that a particular image depicts a thing which is a member of the class of Lions would be to say: LionImage a AnimalImage; foaf:depicts [a Lion]. Lion a owl:Class; subClassOf Mammal; Mammal a owl:Class; AnimalImage a owl:Class; The alternative way of expressing similar information is to use the dc:subject property along with the SKOS model [2] for describing concepts that are intended to act as 'subjects' or 'topics' for information resources. LionImage a AnimalImage; dc:subject LionConcept; LionConcept a skos:Concept; skos:prefLabel 'Lions'; skos:broader MammalConcept; MammalConcept a skos:Concept; skos:prefLabel 'Mammals'; skos:narrower LionConcept; The SKOS vocab already defines a class 'Concept' and a set of properties for organising concepts into a hierarchy, without demanding that the hierarchy implies a subclass relationship. I refer the WG to the document [2] which outlines the SKOS-Core schema, although you should currently ignore the final section on 'using SKOS-Core with DC and FOAF' as this will change shortly to be in line with the model of usage that I have briefly described here. Yours, Alistair. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Apr/att-0061/ClassesAsVa lues.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/thes/1.0/guide/
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2004 09:12:20 UTC