- From: Thomas Baker <thomas.baker@izb.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 17:54:43 +0200
- To: SWBPD <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 03:59:28PM +0200, NANNI Marco FTRD/DMI/SOP wrote: > To conclude, i think it is useless and perhaps even a bad educational > choice to present > RDF, RDFS and OWL as 3 (or 3 + 2) different languages each of them to be > used for a set of problem instead of one language (OWL) with a set of > features each of them which can be used for a set of problem. Could all three be subsumed under one heading, e.g., W3C Semantic Web Language (SWL)? The basic message could then be: "there is one language, which offers different vocabularies and constructs depending on what you want to say". Rather than: "there are three or more languages and this is how they differ." Tom -- Dr. Thomas Baker Thomas.Baker@izb.fraunhofer.de Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven mobile +49-160-9664-2129 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft work +49-30-8109-9027 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-144-2352 Personal email: thbaker79@alumni.amherst.edu
Received on Monday, 5 April 2004 11:49:59 UTC