W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > April 2004

Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft

From: Natasha Noy <noy@SMI.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:49:38 -0700
Message-Id: <B103A0B9-923A-11D8-A755-000A958B5C28@smi.stanford.edu>
Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
To: "NANNI Marco FTRD/DMI/SOP" <marco.nanni@francetelecom.com>


>  1) Approach 3 :
>          You write : "We can take the second option in Approach 2"
>         The figure seems to be relative to the first option ? am i 
> wrong ?

you are right -- I'll fix this.

> 2) Approach 1 :
>           The first consideration is : "The resulting ontology is in 
> OWL Full"
> I think that what could be vvery interesting would be to give a little 
> and very simple example of what does this categorization concretely 
> imply; indeed it's not always clear to clearly understand the direct 
> consequences of such a fact.

In this particular case, it means (and DL folks, please, correct me if 
I am wrong) that DL reasoners such as RACER simply won't accept this 
ontology or will ignore the property values that are classes.

I agree with you that we probably need a document on implications of 
moving from OWL FL to OWL Full but this discussion is probably out of 
the scope of the "classes as values" document.

Received on Monday, 19 April 2004 15:52:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:30:53 UTC