Re: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments

Frank van Harmelen wrote:

  > PS: it would be a great service to the community if anybody wrote an
> AS-to-RDF/XML convertor (Sean Bechhofer has already done the inverse 
> (and much harder) direction, at [3])

 > [3] <>

Well, we've actually done the other way round too! But it was still a 
little tricky as it needed some firming up of the abstract syntax so we 
could put it through a parser generator. Details of the grammar we used 
are at [1]. If this is at all useful, I can add this functionality to 
the Validator...



Sean Bechhofer

Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2004 09:33:52 UTC