Re: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the ? TF

Thomas Baker wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 03:59:28PM +0200, NANNI Marco FTRD/DMI/SOP wrote:
>>To conclude, i think it is useless and perhaps even a bad educational
>>choice to present 
>>RDF, RDFS and OWL as 3 (or 3 + 2) different languages each of them to be
>>used for a set of problem instead of one language (OWL) with a set of
>>features each of them which can be used for a set of problem.
> Could all three be subsumed under one heading, e.g., W3C
> Semantic Web Language (SWL)?
> The basic message could then be: "there is one language,
> which offers different vocabularies and constructs depending
> on what you want to say".

That's not made easier by the semantic differences between the languages.
(Jeremy said unhelpfully)

> Rather than: "there are three or more languages and this is
> how they differ."
> Tom

Received on Monday, 5 April 2004 12:07:46 UTC