- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 09:58:27 +0100
- To: "Uschold, Michael F" <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>
- Cc: "DLU BPD (E-mail)" <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Uschold, Michael F wrote: > OPEN QUESTION: > · should we make it a requirement that, say all notes at least have RDF/XML in an appendix? -or- > · should this be entirely up to the author's discression? I believe that a statement of general policy, with extensive discretion, is the best way forward. This allows any reviewer who cares to easily challenge author discretion when it goes against the main thrust of the policy. Otherwise we need to over-engineer the letter of the policy, rather than gradually come to a shared understanding of the spirit (e.g. I think having examples in Turtle and RDF/XML, in-line, like in the OWL Test Cases, fits the spirit, without fitting the letter of Mike's proposal - I don't think this is worth discussing except on a case-by-case basis) Jeremy
Received on Friday, 30 April 2004 05:00:49 UTC