public-rdf-wg@w3.org from May 2011 by date

Tuesday, 31 May 2011

• Re: getting language tags out of the fundamental model (ISSUE-12) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: getting language tags out of the fundamental model (ISSUE-12) Andy Seaborne
• Re: Fwd: getting language tags out of the fundamental model (ISSUE-12) Andy Seaborne
• Re: getting language tags out of the fundamental model (ISSUE-12) Yves Raimond
• Re: getting language tags out of the fundamental model (ISSUE-12) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for resolving ISSUE-64 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for resolving ISSUE-64 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: getting language tags out of the fundamental model (ISSUE-12) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: getting language tags out of the fundamental model (ISSUE-12) Steve Harris
• Fwd: getting language tags out of the fundamental model (ISSUE-12) David Wood
• Re: getting language tags out of the fundamental model (ISSUE-12) Andy Seaborne
• Re: getting language tags out of the fundamental model (ISSUE-12) David Wood
• Re: Proposal for resolving ISSUE-64 Jeremy Carroll
• continued regrets Axel Polleres
• Re: getting language tags out of the fundamental model (ISSUE-12) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: getting language tags out of the fundamental model (ISSUE-12) Yves Raimond
• getting language tags out of the fundamental model (ISSUE-12) Sandro Hawke
• [ALL] Agenda for 1 June 2011 David Wood

Monday, 30 May 2011

• Proposal for resolving ISSUE-64 (was: Re: RDF-ISSUE-64 (langtag-rfc): RFC 3066 or RFC 5646 for language tags? [RDF General]) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-64 (langtag-rfc): RFC 3066 or RFC 5646 for language tags? [RDF General] Pat Hayes
• Re: Rethinking ISSUE-12 with lang datatypes Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-64 (langtag-rfc): RFC 3066 or RFC 5646 for language tags? [RDF General] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-64 (langtag-rfc): RFC 3066 or RFC 5646 for language tags? [RDF General] Pat Hayes
• Re: Another week, another ISSUE-12 proposal Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-64 (langtag-rfc): RFC 3066 or RFC 5646 for language tags? [RDF General] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Rethinking ISSUE-12 with lang datatypes Pat Hayes
• Re: Another week, another ISSUE-12 proposal Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-64 (langtag-rfc): RFC 3066 or RFC 5646 for language tags? [RDF General] Pat Hayes
• Re: Another week, another ISSUE-12 proposal Ivan Herman
• Another week, another ISSUE-12 proposal Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Lang tags are not datatypes Richard Cyganiak
• RDF-ISSUE-64 (langtag-rfc): RFC 3066 or RFC 5646 for language tags? [RDF General] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Rethinking ISSUE-12 with lang datatypes Richard Cyganiak

Thursday, 26 May 2011

• Re: Rethinking ISSUE-12 with lang datatypes Antoine Zimmermann

Saturday, 28 May 2011

• Lang tags are not datatypes Jeremy Carroll

Friday, 27 May 2011

• Re: Rethinking ISSUE-12 with lang datatypes Andy Seaborne
• Re: Rethinking ISSUE-12 with lang datatypes Andy Seaborne
• Re: Rethinking ISSUE-12 with lang datatypes Pat Hayes
• Re: Rethinking ISSUE-12 with lang datatypes Andy Seaborne
• Re: Rethinking ISSUE-12 with lang datatypes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Rethinking ISSUE-12 with lang datatypes Pat Hayes
• Re: Rethinking ISSUE-12 with lang datatypes Andy Seaborne
• Re: Rethinking ISSUE-12 with lang datatypes Andy Seaborne
• Re: Rethinking ISSUE-12 with lang datatypes Ivan Herman
• Re: Rethinking ISSUE-12 with lang datatypes Andy Seaborne
• RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-25 Fabien Gandon

Thursday, 26 May 2011

• Proposed text on replacing URIref with IRI Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Rethinking ISSUE-12 with lang datatypes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Rethinking ISSUE-12 with lang datatypes Andy Seaborne
• Re: Rethinking ISSUE-12 with lang datatypes Richard Cyganiak

Wednesday, 25 May 2011

• Rethinking ISSUE-12 with lang datatypes Antoine Zimmermann

Thursday, 26 May 2011

• Re: Namespace (was: Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: subtypes of xsd:string Ivan Herman
• Re: subtypes of xsd:string Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-63 (html5-datatype): Introduce an HTML5 datatype [RDF General] David Wood
• RDF-ISSUE-63 (html5-datatype): Introduce an HTML5 datatype [RDF General] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: subtypes of xsd:string David Wood
• Re: subtypes of xsd:string Steve Harris
• Re: subtypes of xsd:string Ivan Herman
• Re: subtypes of xsd:string Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: subtypes of xsd:string David Wood

Wednesday, 25 May 2011

• RDF WG Decision on IRIs in RDF Documents David Wood
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Andy Seaborne
• May 18 minutes Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts Ivan Herman
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts Dan Brickley
• Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts Dan Brickley
• Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts Ivan Herman
• Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Reorganizing the RDF Semantics Ivan Herman
• Re: Reorganizing the RDF Semantics Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Namespace (was: Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts) Ivan Herman
• Namespace (was: Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts Ivan Herman
• Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts Ivan Herman
• Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts Richard Cyganiak
• Re: subtypes of xsd:string Ivan Herman
• Re: subtypes of xsd:string Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [ALL] Agenda for 25 May 2011 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts Ivan Herman
• Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts Ivan Herman
• Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts Andy Seaborne
• Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts Dan Brickley
• Re: Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts Ivan Herman
• Re: Reorganizing the RDF Semantics Ivan Herman
• Regrets Thomas Steiner
• Regrets Olivier Corby
• Re: Reorganizing the RDF Semantics Pat Hayes
• Regrets for next 3 telecons Gavin Carothers
• Re: subtypes of xsd:string Pat Hayes
• Re: subtypes of xsd:string Eric Prud'hommeaux
• [ALL] Agenda for 25 May 2011 David Wood

Tuesday, 24 May 2011

• Re: subtypes of xsd:string Jeremy Carroll
• Re: subtypes of xsd:string Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Richard Cyganiak
• Preparing editor's drafts -- Q's for the team contacts Richard Cyganiak
• subtypes of xsd:string Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Jeremy Carroll
• More on the latest ISSUE-12 proposal Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Reorganizing the RDF Semantics Alex Hall
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Steve Harris
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Andy Seaborne
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Andy Seaborne
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Steve Harris
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Ivan Herman
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Steve Harris
• Re: Turtle and CURIES Andy Seaborne
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Andy Seaborne
• Re: Reorganizing the RDF Semantics Ivan Herman
• Re: Reorganizing the RDF Semantics Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Reorganizing the RDF Semantics Ivan Herman
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Jeremy Carroll
• Reorganizing the RDF Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Pat Hayes
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Pat Hayes
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18 Pat Hayes
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Pat Hayes

Monday, 23 May 2011

• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Andy Seaborne
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18 Zhe Wu
• Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18 Zhe Wu
• Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18 Zhe Wu
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals David Wood
• Re: Turtle and CURIES Alex Hall
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: Turtle and CURIES Andy Seaborne
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18 Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18 Schreiber, A.T.
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18 Schreiber, A.T.
• Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18 Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18 Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Talis Editor for RDF JSON Schreiber, A.T.
• Turtle and CURIES David Wood
• Talis Editor for RDF JSON David Wood
• Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18 David Wood
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals David Wood
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18 Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18 Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18 Ivan Herman
• Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Lee Feigenbaum
• Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18 Lee Feigenbaum

Sunday, 22 May 2011

• For scribes: How to generate minutes Richard Cyganiak
• RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18 Richard Cyganiak

Saturday, 21 May 2011

• Re: Quiz results! A hint of consensus on ISSUE-12 William Waites

Friday, 20 May 2011

• Re: History: why are lang tags and datatypes disjoint. Jeremy Carroll
• Quiz results! A hint of consensus on ISSUE-12 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Mischa Tuffield
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Andy Seaborne
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Richard Cyganiak
• Re: IRI vs. URI Reference in RDFa Mischa Tuffield
• Re: IRI vs. URI Reference in RDFa Mischa Tuffield
• Re: IRI vs. URI Reference in RDFa Mischa Tuffield
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: IRI vs. URI Reference in RDFa Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Pat Hayes

Thursday, 19 May 2011

• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Pat Hayes
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Richard Cyganiak
• Re: IRI vs. URI Reference in RDFa Jeremy Carroll
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Ivan Herman
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Ivan Herman
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Ivan Herman
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Pat Hayes
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Alex Hall
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Alex Hall
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Steve Harris
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Ivan Herman
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Richard Cyganiak
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Andy Seaborne
• Re: IRI vs. URI Reference in RDFa Steve Harris
• Re: IRI vs. URI Reference in RDFa Ivan Herman
• IRI vs. URI Reference in RDFa Manu Sporny

Wednesday, 18 May 2011

• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Richard Cyganiak
• History: why are lang tags and datatypes disjoint. Jeremy Carroll
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Steve Harris
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Ivan Herman
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Gavin Carothers
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Richard Cyganiak
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Simplified proposal for string literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Pat Hayes
• Re: Simplified proposal for string literals Pat Hayes
• Re: Simplified proposal for string literals Pat Hayes
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Lee Feigenbaum
• The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Simplified proposal for string literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: basic question on string literals Pat Hayes
• Re: basic question on string literals Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: Regrets for the May 18 teleconference Matteo Brunati
• Re: basic question on string literals Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Simplified proposal for string literals Guus Schreiber
• Re: basic question on string literals Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Simplified proposal for string literals Pat Hayes
• basic question on string literals Pat Hayes
• Re: Simplified proposal for string literals Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Simplified proposal for string literals Pat Hayes
• Re: language entailment Pat Hayes
• Re: Simplified proposal for string literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: language entailment Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Ivan Herman
• Re: Simplified proposal for string literals Nathan
• language entailment Nathan
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Steve Harris
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Steve Harris
• Re: Simplified proposal for string literals Steve Harris
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Regrets for the May 18 teleconference Ivan Herman
• Re: Simplified proposal for string literals Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: REGRETS for tomorrow (traveling) Alex Hall

Tuesday, 17 May 2011

• Simplified proposal for string literals Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Pat Hayes
• Re: REGRETS for tomorrow (traveling) Polleres, Axel
• REGRETS for tomorrow (traveling) Fabien Gandon
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Regrets for the May 18 teleconference Sandro Hawke
• Re: Regrets for the May 18 teleconference Souripriya Das
• Re: Regrets for the May 18 teleconference Lee Feigenbaum
• [ALL] agenda 18 May telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Steve Harris
• Re: Regrets for the May 18 teleconference Mischa Tuffield
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Ivan Herman
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Regrets for the May 18 teleconference Thomas Steiner

Monday, 16 May 2011

• Re: publication infrastructure / respec Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Graph terminology & SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store Protocol Guus Schreiber
• Re: Graph terminology & SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store Protocol Antoine Zimmermann
• Graph terminology & SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store Protocol Lee Feigenbaum

Sunday, 15 May 2011

• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Sandro Hawke
• Re: publication infrastructure / respec Guus Schreiber
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Sandro Hawke

Saturday, 14 May 2011

• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Pat Hayes

Friday, 13 May 2011

• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Steve Harris
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Steve Harris
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Ivan Herman
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Alex Hall
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Alex Hall
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Steve Harris
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Steve Harris
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Alex Hall
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Steve Harris
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Steve Harris
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Steve Harris
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Ivan Herman
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Dan Brickley
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Ivan Herman
• Re: publication infrastructure / respec Ivan Herman
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Pat Hayes
• Re: publication infrastructure / respec Pat Hayes
• Re: publication infrastructure / respec Gavin Carothers

Thursday, 12 May 2011

• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Ivan Herman
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Pat Hayes
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Steve Harris
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Ivan Herman
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Steve Harris
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Thomas Steiner
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Richard Cyganiak
• Re: publication infrastructure / respec Dan Brickley
• Re: publication infrastructure / respec Ivan Herman
• Re: publication infrastructure / respec Dan Brickley
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Ivan Herman
• Re: publication infrastructure / respec Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Ivan Herman
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Richard Cyganiak
• Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Steve Harris
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 11 May 2011

• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Richard Cyganiak
• Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals Richard Cyganiak
• RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-11 Lee Feigenbaum
• Regrets for today's teleconference Zhe Wu
• Re: [ALL] agenda 11 May telecon Thomas Steiner
• Regrets for today's teleconference Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)
• Re: [ALL] agenda 11 May telecon Sandro Hawke
• Re: [ALL] agenda 11 May telecon William Waites
• Re: [ALL] agenda 11 May telecon Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 10 May 2011

• [ALL] agenda 11 May telecon Guus Schreiber
• [ALL] new poll F2F Guus Schreiber
• Regrets for tomorrow's telecon Pierre-Antoine Champin

Monday, 9 May 2011

• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Andy Seaborne
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Alex Hall

Saturday, 7 May 2011

• Linked JSON mailing list Manu Sporny
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Steve Harris
• text/turtle and text/n3 Nathan
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Andy Seaborne
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Eric Prud'hommeaux

Friday, 6 May 2011

• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Andy Seaborne
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Alex Hall
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Steve Harris
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Andy Seaborne
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Andy Seaborne
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Alex Hall
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Andy Seaborne
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution David Wood
• Regrets for Wed, 11 May Telecon David Wood
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Sandro Hawke
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Andy Seaborne

Wednesday, 4 May 2011

• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Alex Hall
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Alex Hall
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Antoine Zimmermann
• short notice regrets Axel Polleres
• Re: Agenda 4 May William Waites
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Andy Seaborne
• Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Andy Seaborne
• ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Ivan Herman
• Re: Agenda 4 May Richard Cyganiak
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Richard Cyganiak
• regrets for telecon Guus Schreiber

Tuesday, 3 May 2011

• Re: Agenda 4 May David Wood
• Re: Agenda 4 May Andy Seaborne
• Re: Agenda 4 May David Wood
• Re: Agenda 4 May Thomas Steiner
• Re: Agenda 4 May David Wood
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-46 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit "Should RDF have a mechanism for declaring two uri's to be equivalent?" [Cleanup tasks] Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Agenda 4 May Souripriya Das
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Andy Seaborne
• Re: Agenda 4 May David Wood
• Agenda 4 May David Wood
• RDF-ISSUE-62 (revisit-test-manifest-semantics): Revisit "The test cases manifest format has a semantic error" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-61 (revisit-rdf-plain-and-xml-literals): Revisit "An XML literal without markup, e.g. "foo" should denote the same thing as the plain literal "foo"" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-60 (revisit-rdf-fragids-in-embedded-rdf): Revisit "Defining the interpretation of fragment identifiers in RDF embedded in other document formats" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-59 (revisit-rdfms-syntax-incomplete): Revisit "The RDF/XML syntax can't represent an an arbritary graph structure" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-58 (revisit-rdf-mapping-lists-and-containers): Revisit "A request to define a formal semantic relationship between lists and containers" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-57 (revisit-rdfs-layered-subset): Revisit "A request to define subset of RDFS with a more conventional layered architecture" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-56 (revisit-rdfs-fyi): Revisit "A request for a semantics free predicate for comments" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-55 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit "Request for a richer vocabulary for languages" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-54 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit "RDF collection syntax should allow literals" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-53 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit "RDF is not just a data model; an RDF statement is an assertion" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-52 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit "How to indicate whether RDF embedded in another document is asserted" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-51 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit "Suggestion that the concept of context is missing from RDF" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-50 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit "Request to allow b-nodes as property labels" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-49 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit "Should the subjects of RDF statements be allowed to be literals" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-48 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit "The design of the RDF Model collection classes exhibit various awkward features. Might these be augmented with a 'better' design?" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-47 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit "RDF embedded in XHTML and other XML documents is hard to validate" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-46 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit "Should RDF have a mechanism for declaring two uri's to be equivalent?" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-45 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit "The syntax needs a more convenient way to express the reification of a statement" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-44 (rdfms-qnames-can't-represent-all-uris): Revisit "The RDF XML syntax cannot represent all possible Property URI's" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-43 (revisit-rdfms-abouteachprefix): Revisit "Suggestion that Qnames should be allowed as values for attributes such as rdf:about" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-42 (revisit-rdfms-abouteachprefix): Revisit "Something should be done about aboutEachPrefix construct" [Cleanup tasks] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

Monday, 2 May 2011

• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Richard Cyganiak
• Re: IRI guidance Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Absolute IRIs (Was: Re: IRI guidance) Alex Hall
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Andy Seaborne
• Re: Absolute IRIs (Was: Re: IRI guidance) Nathan
• Re: Absolute IRIs (Was: Re: IRI guidance) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Absolute IRIs (Was: Re: IRI guidance) Ivan Herman
• Re: Absolute IRIs (Was: Re: IRI guidance) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Absolute IRIs (Was: Re: IRI guidance) Alex Hall
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Ivan Herman
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Andy Seaborne
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Ivan Herman
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Andy Seaborne
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Ivan Herman
• Re: [TTL] Differences between SPARQL and Turtle. Andy Seaborne

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 May 2011 17:52:31 UTC