Re: Proposal for ISSUE-40 Skolemization

+1 to the proposal.

I particularly note the
"""
Systems which want Skolem IRIs to be recognizable outside of the system ...
"""

Just round-tripping the blank nodes back to the same store can 
reasonably use any IRI scheme that works for the system in question.

And it does not promise dereferencability.

	Andy



On 12/05/11 16:58, Pat Hayes wrote:
>
> On May 12, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
>
>> On 2011-05-12, at 14:46, Thomas Steiner wrote:
>>
>>>> I'd be tempted to put the proposal to the vote with only the HTTP option and see if it draws any objections.
>>>
>>> +1 for making the URIs dereferencable. Leaves all doors open for
>>> actually putting useful content there.
>>
>> I'm not keen on enforcing dereferencability. bNodes aren't dereferencable, so it's quite large step.
>
> +1  Being agnostic on this is not closing doors, but it allows skolem-URI-generators to operate at high speed without having to get involved with setting up a web service as backup.
>
> Pat
>
>
>>
>> - Steve
>>
>> --
>> Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
>> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
>> +44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
>> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
>> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
>>
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973
> 40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
>
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 12 May 2011 21:02:42 UTC