- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 15:59:16 +0100
- To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/StringLiterals/LanguageTaggedStringDatatypeProposal I've added a table that summarizes the current situation with literals in RDF, and a second table that shows the changes implied by this proposal. Also, I've changed the name rdf:LanguageTaggedLiteral to rdf:LanguageTaggedString, for clarity. We should find a shorter name anyways. Pat proposed rdf:Text. Objections are currently: - cost of change to existing implementations - effect on OWL unclear Best, Richard
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2011 14:59:45 UTC