- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 11:54:56 -0400
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On May 31, 2011, at 10:56, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > On 5/31/2011 7:17 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote: >> In other words, we could say "foo"@bar is syntactic sugar for something >> like [ a rdf:LinguisticExpression; rdf:language "bar"; rdf:value "foo"]. >> I know that doesn't address everything, but it has pretty much the same >> problems everything else does being modeled in RDF. :-) > > That was a design considered and rejected by the previous group. Personally I prefer it; but I don't think we should reopen that can of worms. At the risk of being difficult, why not? Regards, Dave > > Jeremy > >
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 15:55:28 UTC