- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:00:01 +0200
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Cc: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, "RDF-WG public-rdf-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 12 May 2011 16:15, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote: > On 2011-05-12, at 14:46, Thomas Steiner wrote: > >>> I'd be tempted to put the proposal to the vote with only the HTTP option and see if it draws any objections. >> >> +1 for making the URIs dereferencable. Leaves all doors open for >> actually putting useful content there. > > I'm not keen on enforcing dereferencability. bNodes aren't dereferencable, so it's quite large step. Dereferencing is not enforceable anyway (people have right to private data, after all, and configuring a server can have security consequences). Let's just say they're URIs and leave it to the world to decide what - if anything - to put there. That aside, +1 on the general proposal cheers Dan
Received on Friday, 13 May 2011 08:00:29 UTC