W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Graph terminology & SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store Protocol

From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 14:34:12 +0200
Message-ID: <4DD119C4.1090200@vu.nl>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>

Thanks for the heads-up. We will add this to the telecon agenda. Next to 
comments from individual members we should also consider doing a WG review.

Indeed, getting consensus on the graph terminology is essential.


On 16/05/2011 02:27, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> Hi,
> The SPARQL WG has recently published 5 Last Call Working Drafts[1]. We'd welcome
> feedback on these drafts from anyone in this group (or any other community
> member, of course).
> I wanted to call this group's attention particularly to the SPARQL 1.1 Graph
> Store HTTP Protocol [2], which defines the meaning of various HTTP verbs against
> a graph URI. In specifying this behavior, the document defines some terms [3]
> that are likely also relevant to this group's work.
> I'd like to ask that any interested members of this group take a look and share
> their thoughts in this thread. If there is consensus around the terms used in
> the Graph Store HTTP Protocol document, that's great; otherwise, I'd like to
> setup a telecon between interested members of this group and of the SPARQL WG to
> attempt to reach such consensus, in order that the Recommendations produced by
> the two groups converge on shared terminology for the concepts having to do with
> graphs.
> thanks,
> Lee
> [1] http://www.w3.org/News/2011#entry-9095
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-sparql11-http-rdf-update-20110512/
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-sparql11-http-rdf-update-20110512/#terminology

Prof. Guus Schreiber
Web & Media, Computer Science
VU University Amsterdam
Received on Monday, 16 May 2011 12:34:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:06 UTC