- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:50:05 +0200
- To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
- Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Regrets for today and next week, I'm at all-day meetings in Europe. On ISSUE-12, I'm strongly in favor of somehow avoiding users having to see both plain literals and xsd:string literals, but don't really care which way we do it. On ISSUE-40, I'm sorry I haven't put specific proposals into the Wiki yet. I'd suggest we focus on it as a solution to ISSUE-21, although I know it has other use cases as well. Specifically, how do folks who don't want to share bnodes between graphs propose to interchange annotations on triples made of bnodes? ISSUE-40 suggests one solution. -- Sandro On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 15:15 +0200, Guus Schreiber wrote: > All, > > Agenda is online at: > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2011.05.11 > > I suggest to discuss: > - decision on Rec editor tools?! > - status ISSUE-12 (plain literal vs. xsd:string) > - status ISSUE-40 (Skolemization advice) > - remaining time: rest of postponed issues from 2004 > > Comments/additions welcome, of course. > > Guus >
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2011 12:50:14 UTC