- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 12:41:25 -0500
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On May 7, 2011, at 8:19 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> ....
> To clarify my example:
>
> That's not a graph - it's a serialization. My question is what graph does it produce when parsed given the proposed text.
>
> If it were:
>
> :x :p "foo" .
> :x :p "foo" .
>
> then it produces a graph with one triple.
>
> :x :p "foo" .
> :x :p "foo"^^xsd:string .
>
> Is the effect of "and tell systems to silently convert xs:string literals to plain literals without language tag" supposed to cause one or two triples?
>
> As someone who couldn't make the F2F (so all I see is the text), I'm trying to understand what exactly was meant here. Before we discuss {xsd:string}-entailment, we need to know the starting graph.
Ah, now I understand the example. OK, point taken, and I agree about getting this clear.
Pat
------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973
40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office
Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax
FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Monday, 9 May 2011 17:42:06 UTC