- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 23:53:35 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 24 May 2011, at 20:27, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> I note that many of Andy's issues would be solved if rdf:LanguageTaggedString were a type but not a datatype.
One motivation is to have DATATYPE("foo"@en) return something other than error/undefined in SPARQL.
Best,
Richard
> i.e
>
> rdf:LanguageTaggedString rdf:type rdfs:Class .
>
> and
>
> its class extension is the set of all language tagged literals.
>
> This may also address some of Peter's concerns to do with needing to modify OWL.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2011 22:54:11 UTC