Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals

On 24 May 2011, at 20:27, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> I note that many of Andy's issues would be solved if rdf:LanguageTaggedString were a type but not a datatype.

One motivation is to have DATATYPE("foo"@en) return something other than error/undefined in SPARQL.

Best,
Richard



> i.e
> 
> rdf:LanguageTaggedString rdf:type rdfs:Class .
> 
> and
> 
> its class extension is the set of all language tagged literals.
> 
> This may also address some of Peter's concerns to do with needing to modify OWL.
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2011 22:54:11 UTC