Re: Another week, another ISSUE-12 proposal

On 30 May 2011, at 17:25, Pat Hayes wrote:
>> 2. "foo" and corresponding forms in other concrete syntaxes are syntactic sugar for "foo"^^xsd:string. In general, both forms MAY be used and are equivalent.
> "Equivalent" has multiple meanings. In one of them, these forms are equivalent in RDF now. Better say, "represent identical literals in the abstract syntax" or some such phrasing. 

Good point, thanks. I updated the proposal accordingly:


Received on Monday, 30 May 2011 18:35:24 UTC