- From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 07:56:41 -0700
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 5/31/2011 7:17 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > In other words, we could say "foo"@bar is syntactic sugar for something > like [ a rdf:LinguisticExpression; rdf:language "bar"; rdf:value "foo"]. > I know that doesn't address everything, but it has pretty much the same > problems everything else does being modeled in RDF. :-) That was a design considered and rejected by the previous group. Personally I prefer it; but I don't think we should reopen that can of worms. Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 14:57:31 UTC