- From: David Wood <dpw@talis.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 16:30:38 -0400
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: "public-rdf-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
OK, the agenda has been updated. Will 15-20 minutes be sufficient? Regards, Dave On May 3, 2011, at 9:29, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: > It would be helpful to have a process slot for SPARQL/Turtle alignment. > > 1/ Give a chance for the silent majority to speak > 2/ (Outcome) a list of the areas of disagreement > > Andy > > On 03/05/11 03:34, David Wood wrote: >> Please speak up if anyone thinks we are ready to discuss >> SPARQL/Turtle alignment. It seems to me there is still enough >> disagreement on the list that it could eat time during the telecon, >> so I thought we should leave it on the list for now. I am sensitive >> to the timing re the SPARQL WG call, though, so say so if you >> disagree. >> >> Regards, Dave >> >> >> >> >> On May 2, 2011, at 22:26, David Wood wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The agenda for Wed, 4 May is at: >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2011.05.04 >>> >>> Scribe: Souripriya Das Alternate: Thomas Steiner >>> >>> We will be revisiting RDF postponed issues from the original RDF WG >>> and attempting to come to consensus on as many as possible. You >>> have probably seen the new issues raised in Tracker. >>> >>> Regards, Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 20:28:38 UTC