- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 13:21:46 +0100
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 24 May 2011, at 13:10, Steve Harris wrote: > I agree with Andy, this is not going to play well with existing systems, unless rdf:LanguageTaggedString exists purely in the abstract syntax, you can still end up with literals with both a datatype, and a language tag. It *does* purely exist in the abstract syntax, as I said in my mail but you snipped it: “7. In concrete syntaxes, the "foo"@en form MUST be used for rdf:LanguageTaggedStrings.” [1] Best, Richard [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/StringLiterals/LanguageTaggedLiteralDatatypeProposal
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2011 12:22:15 UTC