W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 13:21:46 +0100
Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E47AEAAF-5D88-4DBA-9DAA-1B380DC6044E@cyganiak.de>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
On 24 May 2011, at 13:10, Steve Harris wrote:
> I agree with Andy, this is not going to play well with existing systems, unless rdf:LanguageTaggedString exists purely in the abstract syntax, you can still end up with literals with both a datatype, and a language tag.

It *does* purely exist in the abstract syntax, as I said in my mail but you snipped it:

7. In concrete syntaxes, the "foo"@en form MUST be used for rdf:LanguageTaggedStrings. [1]


[1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/StringLiterals/LanguageTaggedLiteralDatatypeProposal
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2011 12:22:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:07 UTC