Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals

On May 13, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Alex Hall wrote:

> The main roadblock that I can see is that a datatype maps a single lexical string to a value; you'd have to define a special notion of datatyping for xsd:string which is essentially an identity mapping of <lexical, lang> pairs.  Otherwise you'd have "chat"^^xsd:string@en and "chat"^^xsd:string@fr with the same value, which won't fly.
> -Alex
Yes, exactly, this is the heart of the matter. See my proposal in a reply to Richard to deal with this by defining an 'exceptional' extension to rdf:PlainLiteral (or, it could be another datatype altogether, but I wanted to avoid alternative-bloat.)


IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile

Received on Friday, 13 May 2011 21:05:21 UTC