Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals

• From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
• Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 09:14:51 -0400
• To: <richard@cyganiak.de>
• CC: <jeremy@topquadrant.com>, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <20110525.091451.935423847625170868.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Subject: Re: Action-48 text: a New Plan for plain literals
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:53:35 -0500

> 
> On 24 May 2011, at 20:27, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>> I note that many of Andy's issues would be solved if rdf:LanguageTaggedString were a type but not a datatype.
> 
> One motivation is to have DATATYPE("foo"@en) return something other than error/undefined in SPARQL.
> 
> Best,
> Richard

Umm, isn't that SPARQL business?

Also, rdf:PlainLiteral could be used for this already.

peter

Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2011 13:17:35 UTC