Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18

On 23 May 2011, at 05:49, Ivan Herman wrote:
> Indeed, that was my immediate question reading the minutes... Do we have a resolution on the skolems (pending a s/steveH/???/ change)?

Well, there was a proposal. There was a vote that showed no opposition (except to the SteveH name which still needs to be changed, and some re-wording which Peter provided in the meantime). Guus asked me to close ISSUE-40 with a pointer to the resolution. I tried to do so, but found the resolution not recorded in the minutes.

Looking at the minutes again, it was scribed that the chair said that we can close ISSUE-40, which implies that there was an (unscribed) resolution. I'm going to modify the minutes now to add the resolution. If anyone recalls this differently, please speak up and we'll revert.

Thanks,
Richard


> 
> I.
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman
> Tel:+31 641044153
> http://www.ivan-herman.net
> 
> 
> 
> On 23 May 2011, at 04:08, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote:
> 
>> Was there a resolution on the proposal regarding ISSUE-40, or was that tabled for an un-minuted reason?
>> 
>> thanks,
>> Lee
>> 
>> On 5/22/2011 4:37 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>>> Seems like Wednesday's scribe didn't find time yet to generate the minutes, so I just did it:
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-05-18
>>> 
>>> I recall that one more resolution was made after a vote, but it was not scribed: accept the proposal on ISSUE-40.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Richard
>>> 
>> 
>

Received on Monday, 23 May 2011 06:05:58 UTC