W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 13:59:56 -0500
Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <21743ECE-019E-4BF0-9463-2FC75BB70901@ihmc.us>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
I believe this issue was discussed in some depth by the first RDF WG, and it was decided that lang tags should *not* creep into RDF from external XML, perhaps (this is a now a very dim memory) because one might want to describe eg. French text using English XML. (Can anyone else confirm or disconfirm this? Dan B.?)


On May 18, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> On 14 May 2011, at 16:44, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example/x" xml:lang="en" >
>>   <p>foo</p>
>>   <q rdf:datatype="&xsd;string">foo</q>
>> </rdf:Description>
>> that is, with the xml:lang not on the literal but further out in the XML because xml:lang propagates inwards.
>> What happens to the xsd:string? Either existing RDf changes or RDF/XML can't write langs on xsd:string?
> Currently, the datatyped "foo" would of course not receive a language tag, and I think we have to keep it like that because of deployed content. So I guess this means that in RDF/XML you'd have to use the non-datatyped string syntax if you want a language tag to apply to the string. Admittedly, that's a bit awkward and will cause some user confusion, but perhaps no worse than what we already have (just different).
> Best,
> Richard

IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 19:00:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:06 UTC