- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:58:01 -0500
- To: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <richard@cyganiak.de>, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On May 18, 2011, at 2:24 PM, Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider wrote: > From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> > Subject: Re: The RDF 1.1 Literal Quiz > Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 14:18:07 -0500 > > >>> Q3. Is this be a valid Turtle file? >>> >>> <a> <b> "foo"^^rdf:PlainLiteral . >> >> No. "foo@"^^rdf:PlainLIteral is barely legal but strongly deprecated in favor of the plain literal syntax. > > Huh? Isn't this legal? > > However, "foo" is not in the lexical space of rdf:PlainLiteral, so the > interpretation is not what one might expect. Sorry, I was using "legal' loosely. It is, as you say, not what one might expect. For example _:x owl:sameAs "foo"^^rdf:PlainLiteral . _:x rdf:type rdf:PlainLIteral . is inconsistent. I suspected that Richard meant to write it with a trailing @, but that was only a guess. Pat > > peter > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2011 14:58:44 UTC