- From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 01:19:58 +0000
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
RDF-ISSUE-46 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit "Should RDF have a mechanism for declaring two uri's to be equivalent?" [Cleanup tasks] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/46 Raised by: David Wood On product: Cleanup tasks See http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-equivalent-uris rdf-equivalent-uri's: Should RDF have a mechanism for declaring two uri's to be equivalent? RESOLVE: Closed, owl provides owl:sameAs already. Pierre-Antoine wishes to continue discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Apr/0339.html NB: The Charter allows us to "Update and extend the RDF Primer. New features may include multi-syntax examples, more up-to-date in terms of the vocabularies used, may deal with issues around Linked Data like the use of “owl:sameAs”, the “follow-your-nose” algorithm, etc."
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:19:59 UTC