Re: Proposal for ISSUE-12, string literals

On 18 May 2011, at 10:07, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
>> It's not quite that simple. @en matches @en-GB, but they're not equal c.f.
>> and
> Do they *match* in the sense of the model theory? In other words, does
>  :a :b "chat"@en-GB .
> entail
>  :a :b "chat"@en .
> in any entailment regime defined by the RDF semantics ??


"chat", "chat"@en and "chat"@en-GB are completely different and unrelated things from the point of view of the Semantics document.

So if "chat", "chat"^^rdflang:en and "chat"^^rdflang:en-GB are also completely different and unrelated things, then we're no worse off than before.


Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 11:51:44 UTC