Re: ISSUE-12: xs:string VS plain literals: proposed resolution

On 05/06/2011 04:22 PM, Steve Harris wrote:
> Not really DATATYPE("foo") is xsd:string already.

yes, but it only states that for *simple literals* (that are literals
without language type, IIRC). It does not seem to say anything about
literals with a language tag :-(

A test on dbpedia is not really compelling as both datatype("foo") and
datatype("foo"@en) seem to return NULL, which for the former would mean
a non-conformant implementation...{}{}


Received on Monday, 9 May 2011 17:11:49 UTC