- From: RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 01:23:17 +0000
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
RDF-ISSUE-49 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit "Should the subjects of RDF statements be allowed to be literals" [Cleanup tasks] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/49 Raised by: David Wood On product: Cleanup tasks See http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-literalsubjects rdfms-literalsubjects: Should the subjects of RDF statements be allowed to be literals CONTINUE: the situation is unclear. In a sense, literals are resources. Restrictions are largely (but not entirely) syntactic. NB: Must RESOLVED AS CONTINUE since this is explicitly out of scope for this WG: Removing current restrictions in the RDF model (e.g., literals not allowed as subjects, or blank nodes as predicates) Richard proposes to CLOSE, but future WGs may wish to address: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Apr/0345.html
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:23:18 UTC