- From: William Waites <ww@styx.org>
- Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 16:18:33 +0200
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
* [2011-05-20 15:27:03 +0100] Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> écrit: ] > Q20. { <a> <b> "foo" . } => { <a> <b> "foo"@en . } ] > Q21. { <a> <b> "foo"@en . } => { <a> <b> "foo" . } ] > Q22. { <a> <b> "foo"@en . } => { <a> <b> "foo"@en-GB . } ] > Q23. { <a> <b> "foo"@en-GB . } => { <a> <b> "foo"@en . } ] > Q24. { <a> <b> "foo"@fr . } => { <a> <b> "foo"@en . } ] ] Consensus: Clear no to all, except a few who wouldn't oppose if Q23 ] were done, but no one strongly wants any of this. I was just looking at RFC2616, Note: This use of a prefix matching rule does not imply that language tags are assigned to languages in such a way that it is always true that if a user understands a language with a certain tag, then this user will also understand all languages with tags for which this tag is a prefix. The prefix rule simply allows the use of prefix tags if this is the case. I read this to vaguely support Q23 but certainly with nothing so strong as actual entailment, which pretty much aligns with the quiz responses, which is a good sign. Cheers, -w -- William Waites <mailto:ww@styx.org> http://river.styx.org/ww/ <sip:ww@styx.org> F4B3 39BF E775 CF42 0BAB 3DF0 BE40 A6DF B06F FD45
Received on Saturday, 21 May 2011 14:18:57 UTC