- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 14:29:29 +0100
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
It would be helpful to have a process slot for SPARQL/Turtle alignment. 1/ Give a chance for the silent majority to speak 2/ (Outcome) a list of the areas of disagreement Andy On 03/05/11 03:34, David Wood wrote: > Please speak up if anyone thinks we are ready to discuss > SPARQL/Turtle alignment. It seems to me there is still enough > disagreement on the list that it could eat time during the telecon, > so I thought we should leave it on the list for now. I am sensitive > to the timing re the SPARQL WG call, though, so say so if you > disagree. > > Regards, Dave > > > > > On May 2, 2011, at 22:26, David Wood wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The agenda for Wed, 4 May is at: >> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2011.05.04 >> >> Scribe: Souripriya Das Alternate: Thomas Steiner >> >> We will be revisiting RDF postponed issues from the original RDF WG >> and attempting to come to consensus on as many as possible. You >> have probably seen the new issues raised in Tracker. >> >> Regards, Dave >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 13:29:59 UTC