SEM: common class concept
Revised proposed response to: rdf:about and owl:sameIndividualAs oddities
proposed reply for Semantics and Abstract Syntax (and some general OWL Lite, CR, & implementation) comments
- Re: proposed reply for Semantics and Abstract Syntax (and some general OWL Lite, CR, & implementation) comments
- Re: proposed reply for Semantics and Abstract Syntax (and some general OWL Lite, CR, & implementation) comments
Re: proposed reply for Re: OWL S&AS comment - owl:Ontology mapping to/from RDF triples
Proposed response to: rdf:about and owl:sameIndividualAs oddities
Re: proposed reploy for ``OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics review comments''
Proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0083.html
WOWG: IMPORTANT - LC Comments List - Look for your name
- Re: WOWG: IMPORTANT - LC Comments List - Look for your name
- comments with different status from Jim's [was Re: WOWG: IMPORTANT - LC Comments List - Look for your name]
comment from Karl Dubost
Minutes, WebOnt, 2003-05-29
- Re: Minutes, WebOnt, 2003-05-29
- Re: Minutes, WebOnt, 2003-05-29
- Re: Minutes, WebOnt, 2003-05-29
- Re: Minutes, WebOnt, 2003-05-29
- Re: Minutes, WebOnt, 2003-05-29
- Re: Minutes, WebOnt, 2003-05-29
I18N review request
separating consistency, conformance from the state of the web
Regrets - Stanton
Regrets for 5/29 telecon
making imports tests
regrets for may 29 telecom
Tests in responses to LC comments on DL design
Probable Regrets, 29th April
OWL DL in RDF
regrets -- 29 May telecon
regrets: 5/29 telecon
regrets for May 29
What OWL doesn't do (LC response editing)
presentation syntax publication details: abstract, namespace name
Proposed response regarding imports issue
owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide)
- Re: owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide)
- Re: owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide)
- Re: owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide)
- Re: owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide)
Agenda for telecon -- May 29 2003
- Re: Agenda for telecon -- May 29 2003
- RE: Agenda for telecon -- May 29 2003
- Re: Agenda for telecon -- May 29 2003
- Re: Agenda for telecon -- May 29 2003
Reasoning and inference are the same, or different.
TEST all changes included, ready to ship
Minutes - WebOnt Telecon May 22, 2003
versionInfo and issue list
Minutes of the beer session
Re: imports issue
WOWG: Report from WWW 2003 - OWL presentation/issues
TEST
regrets for 22 May
Regrets - Stanton
regrets may 22, 29, june 5, 12
Regrets, May 22
Regrets (May 22)
WOWG: agenda May 22 telecon
- Regrets, May 22
- Re: WOWG: agenda May 22 telecon
- Re: WOWG: agenda May 22 telecon
- Re: WOWG: agenda May 22 telecon
- Re: WOWG: agenda May 22 telecon
regrets telecon 22 may
Fwd: Missing references for OWL issue 5.6 daml:imports
S&AS: Treatment of imports in RDF-Compatible Semantics
- Re: S&AS: Treatment of imports in RDF-Compatible Semantics
- Re: S&AS: Treatment of imports in RDF-Compatible Semantics
Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue
- Re: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue
- RE: Proposed response to Golbeck regarding imports issue
RDF Core decision on LC issue timbl-03
Annotations in Abstract Syntax
Re: datatyping in test for Pat's review
Re: move oneOf - should issue be opened? (was Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP)
Test Cases: Extended Cardinality Testing
WebOnt response to your issue timbl-03
XMLLiteral examples for I18N
datatyping in test
test count
WOWG: contentive comment summary
REGRETS: Agenda/Logistics - Telecon May 15, 2003
belated regrets, 5/15 telecon
Minutes - WebOnt Telecon May 15, 2003
- effects of changes to RDF datatyping
regrets May 22 telecon
Regrets: Telecon May 22 2003
RE: Datatypes
complete and terminating
approve test cases
Agenda/Logistics - Telecon May 15, 2003
- Re: Agenda/Logistics - Telecon May 15, 2003
- Regrets: Telecon May 15, 2003
- RE: Agenda/Logistics - Telecon May 15, 2003
Test index added
Re: move oneOf - should issue be opened? (was Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP)
Comment on TEST
TEST updated document
regrets May 15
Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC?
- Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC?
- Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC?
- Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC?
- Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC?
- Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC?
- Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC?
regrets for 5-15-2003 phone call
proposed reply to Re: OWL S&AS: Translation to RDF Graphs
- Re: proposed reply to Re: OWL S&AS: Translation to RDF Graphs
- Re: proposed reply to Re: OWL S&AS: Translation to RDF Graphs
proposed reply for Re: OWL S&AS comment - owl:Ontology mapping to/from RDF triples
- Re: proposed reply for Re: OWL S&AS comment - owl:Ontology mapping to/from RDF triples
- Re: proposed reply for Re: OWL S&AS comment - owl:Ontology mapping to/from RDF triples
[Fwd: comments on OWL Last Call drafts]
raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC?
proposed partial reply for [Re: Remarks on OWL Guide and question about AS&S]
Agenda for this week (late again)
closing threads in public-webont-comments
Agenda request: Test LC vote
probable regrets for thurs due to travel
Re: Datatypes in test (attn Ian, Pat, Sandro) RE: comments on OWL test cases
Re: Datatypes
Further broken link in S&AS
nominals and cardinalities
Datatypes in test (attn Ian, Pat, Sandro) RE: comments on OWL test cases
comments on OWL test cases
- Re: comments on OWL test cases
- Re: comments on OWL test cases
- Re: comments on OWL test cases
- Re: comments on OWL test cases
- Re: comments on OWL test cases
More tests verified
SAT tests in TEST doc
Jena comment: Syntax Checker Implementation Report]
owl:All(something) ??
- Re: owl:All(something) ??
- Re: owl:All(something) ??
- Re: owl:All(something) ??
- Re: owl:All(something) ??
- Re: owl:All(something) ??
- Re: owl:All(something) ??
- Re: owl:All(something) ??
Proposed response to "imports error in App. B of OWL Language Reference 31 March 2003"
Fwd: comments on wording in AS&S
Testing Test
Re: rdf:about and owl:sameIndividualAs oddities
SEM: OWL Full semantics
Re: TEST review copy
Re: S&AS comments
Minutes from webont telecon of 8 May
Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP
- Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP
- Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP
- Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP
- Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP
- Re: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP
- RE: Proposed response to Martin Merry, HP
bug in semantics (was Re: intersectionOf and subClassOf)
- Re: bug in semantics (was Re: intersectionOf and subClassOf)
- Re: bug in semantics (was Re: intersectionOf and subClassOf)
Comments on OWL from XML Schema WG
proposed reploy for ``OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics review comments''
consistency in mapping of properties
proposed interim response for ``Comments from RDFCore on S+AS''
CFP: Workshop on PRACTICAL AND SCALABLE SEMANTIC SYSTEMS
TEST: various completed actions (imports, datatypeproperties, subj pred class, ...)
Further wine.owl suggestions
TEST: description-logic testcases
REGRETS: WOWG: agenda May 8 telecon
RE: GUIDE: wine.owl
Regrets, 8/5/03
Minor comments about the Overview document
introduction
Regrets for 2003-05-08 telecon
Proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0027.html
WOWG: agenda May 8 telecon
regrets: 5/8 telecon
TEST: last call candidate (?)
- Re: TEST: last call candidate (?)
- Re: TEST: last call candidate (?)
- Re: TEST: last call candidate (?)
bug in InverseFunctionalProperty definition?
Fwd: Re: Comment on non-global keys
AGENDA a few hours late
Issue 3.2 QCR: proposal to POSTPONE
More Testing
[Fwd: Re: [Jena-devel] RE: WOWG: Need to know about your implementations -- ASAP]
TEST status
Comment on non-global keys
Privacy comment on public-comments
Inverse roles
WOWG: Need to know about your implementations -- ASAP
- RE: WOWG: Need to know about your implementations -- ASAP
- Re: WOWG: Need to know about your implementations -- ASAP
- Re: WOWG: Need to know about your implementations -- ASAP
Re: Partial? regrets May 1st
GUIDE: wine.owl XSD bug
rdf:List RE: timbl-03
proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0008.html
Issues List updated
Guide Comments: Proposed response.
TEST: extra-credit/Manifest002
Guide: Proposed response to comments.
Re: Proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0029.html
CR/PR questions
rdf:List
QCR banquets
approved testcases
Re: QCRs - How much time are they worth?
Re: Moving owl:Nothing from DL to Lite
regrets for may 8 webont telecon
Guide Comments: Suggested response w/ question
- Re: Guide Comments: Suggested response w/ question
- Re: Guide Comments: Suggested response w/ question
- RE: Guide Comments: Suggested response w/ question
Regrets for 2003-05-01 telecon
AGENDA and LOGISTICS, telecon of May 1, 2003
datatypes decision not carried out in specs?!?
- RE: datatypes decision not carried out in specs?!?
- Re: datatypes decision not carried out in specs?!?
- Re: datatypes decision not carried out in specs?!?