- From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 08:59:47 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)
- To: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
- cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 14 May 2003, Ian Horrocks wrote: > > On May 14, Jeremy Carroll writes: > > > > > oiled http://oiled.man.example.uk/test# > > > > I had changed it from oiled.man.ac.uk; I believed that the URI is fine. > > > > (Pubrules excepts it as OK) > > > > However reading the RFC > > > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2606.txt > > > > I discover that example.uk is not reserved, and I should have used one of > > example.org > > example.com > > example.net > > example > > > > > > I believe pubrules would barf on oiled.man.example, so I propose to use > > oiled.man.example.net > > > > I am assuming that Sean and Ian prefer to have some (subtle) credit given to > > the oiled tool .... > > I suppose I would prefer it, but I don't feel very strongly about > it. Sean may have different ideas. Any publicity is, of course, nice, so including the reference to oiled would be preferable. At this point, however, I'd be prepared to see http://example.net if that's what's needed to push it through. Sean -- Sean Bechhofer seanb@cs.man.ac.uk http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2003 04:04:11 UTC