Re: proposed reply for Semantics and Abstract Syntax (and some general OWL Lite, CR, & implementation) comments

On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 14:27, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> [ Proposed response for
> ] 

I would prefer to avoid ad-hoc/post-hoc design rationale; I'd prefer
to quote from the proceedings of the WG (the specs and/or
the issues list/decision record). But given that
that the high order comment seems to be "get it out
the door" I think this is a tolerable level of putting
words in the WG's mouth.

So thanks for drafting it and please do send it.

> This message responds to your comments, in each case not suggesting any
> changes to the S&AS document.  This is not actually a rejection of your
> comments, however.  I feel that you are generally satisfied with the
> situation as it stands, but that some improvements could be made, if
> possible.
> One comment that you make corresponds to a re-opened issue that may result
> in a change - if this indeed happens we will let you know.  

Dan Connolly, W3C

Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 15:38:23 UTC