- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 16:57:36 +0200
- To: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
[Note: discussion on LC comments (item 3) may depend on
attendance]
AGENDA Teleconference Web Ontology Working Group
May 22, 1200 (East US), 0900 (West US). 1700 (London), 1800 (Budapest)
Duration: 45-60 min
Bridge: +1.617.761.6200 then 9326#.
IRC Chat: irc:irc.w3.org (port 6665), #webont
1. Administrivia
Chair: Schreiber
Scribe: Baget
Role Call
Approve Minutes of May 15:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0271.html
Next telecon: May 29, chair Hendler, scribe Hawke (to be confirmed)
2. Action item review
ACTION: Jim Hendler to report back on implementation feedback.
ACTION: Dan Connolly to create a test for imports
ACTION: Jim Hendler and Dan Connolly to compose a response to the LC
comment on
local and compound keys.
ACTION: Peter Patel-Schneider to work on proof for issue 5.26 B1,B2
ACTION: Dan Connolly publish XML syntax
ACTION: Peter Patel-Schneider and Jeremy Carroll to discuss solutions to
bugs in RDF Semantics in Budapest
ACTION: Jeremy Carroll to make changes to test document concerning
datatypes, as discussed
ACTION: Pat Hayes and Ian Horrocks will review changes
ACTION: Peter Patel-Schneider to design test that shows effects of recent
proposed changes to RDF datatyping and sent to Jeremy Carroll
ACTION: Sandro Hawke to do publishing of Test
ACTION: Jim Hendler respond to XMLLiteral response
3. LC comments
Overview of general comments:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0280.html
3.1 Proposed response to Golbeck's comment on owl:imports (Heflin):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0301.html
3.2 RDFCore: NP completeness of owl/RDF mapping
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0052.html
Description of the problem with possible fixes (Carroll):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Apr/0003.html
Response by Patel-Scheider:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Apr/0004.html
3.3 RDFCore: owl:class not needed?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0004.html
#owlref-rdfcore-owl-class-denotation
It has been suggested to
RDFCore that owl:Class is not needed. RDFCore requests the
creation of test cases to clearly illustrate the differences
between owl:Class and rdfs:Class.
3.4 XMLLiteral examples for I18N (Carroll):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0285.html
4. AOB
--
NOTE: new affiliation per April 1, 2003
Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science
De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718
E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl
Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/ [under construction]
Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2003 10:57:37 UTC