- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 16:57:36 +0200
- To: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
[Note: discussion on LC comments (item 3) may depend on attendance] AGENDA Teleconference Web Ontology Working Group May 22, 1200 (East US), 0900 (West US). 1700 (London), 1800 (Budapest) Duration: 45-60 min Bridge: +1.617.761.6200 then 9326#. IRC Chat: irc:irc.w3.org (port 6665), #webont 1. Administrivia Chair: Schreiber Scribe: Baget Role Call Approve Minutes of May 15: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0271.html Next telecon: May 29, chair Hendler, scribe Hawke (to be confirmed) 2. Action item review ACTION: Jim Hendler to report back on implementation feedback. ACTION: Dan Connolly to create a test for imports ACTION: Jim Hendler and Dan Connolly to compose a response to the LC comment on local and compound keys. ACTION: Peter Patel-Schneider to work on proof for issue 5.26 B1,B2 ACTION: Dan Connolly publish XML syntax ACTION: Peter Patel-Schneider and Jeremy Carroll to discuss solutions to bugs in RDF Semantics in Budapest ACTION: Jeremy Carroll to make changes to test document concerning datatypes, as discussed ACTION: Pat Hayes and Ian Horrocks will review changes ACTION: Peter Patel-Schneider to design test that shows effects of recent proposed changes to RDF datatyping and sent to Jeremy Carroll ACTION: Sandro Hawke to do publishing of Test ACTION: Jim Hendler respond to XMLLiteral response 3. LC comments Overview of general comments: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0280.html 3.1 Proposed response to Golbeck's comment on owl:imports (Heflin): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0301.html 3.2 RDFCore: NP completeness of owl/RDF mapping http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0052.html Description of the problem with possible fixes (Carroll): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Apr/0003.html Response by Patel-Scheider: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Apr/0004.html 3.3 RDFCore: owl:class not needed? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0004.html #owlref-rdfcore-owl-class-denotation It has been suggested to RDFCore that owl:Class is not needed. RDFCore requests the creation of test cases to clearly illustrate the differences between owl:Class and rdfs:Class. 3.4 XMLLiteral examples for I18N (Carroll): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0285.html 4. AOB -- NOTE: new affiliation per April 1, 2003 Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718 E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/ [under construction]
Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2003 10:57:37 UTC