- From: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 22:23:31 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
On May 14, Jeremy Carroll writes: > > > oiled http://oiled.man.example.uk/test# > > I had changed it from oiled.man.ac.uk; I believed that the URI is fine. > > (Pubrules excepts it as OK) > > However reading the RFC > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2606.txt > > I discover that example.uk is not reserved, and I should have used one of > example.org > example.com > example.net > example > > > I believe pubrules would barf on oiled.man.example, so I propose to use > oiled.man.example.net > > I am assuming that Sean and Ian prefer to have some (subtle) credit given to > the oiled tool .... I suppose I would prefer it, but I don't feel very strongly about it. Sean may have different ideas. Ian > > Otherwise, we could just make it > > xmlns:eg = "http://example.net/" > > Jeremy > > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2003 17:23:42 UTC